Welcome to Transportation Law Today

Managed by Paul J. Loftus, a partner at Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Transportation Law Today provides professionals in the rail, transit, inland maritime, and trucking industries with current news and analysis of laws, rulings, and regulatory policies.



Showing posts with label PTC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PTC. Show all posts

Monday, October 5, 2015

House Bill Would Extend PTC Deadline, While Shippers Seek to Force Rail Carriers to Carry TIH/PIH cars

First of all . . Welcome to the new format of "Transportation Law Today" which has been in hiatus for few months, but the blog is back and thanks for your patience.
 
House Bill, H.R. 3651, the "Positive Train Control Enforcement & Implementation Act of 2015" introduced by T&I Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA), with at least 76 sponsors, finally offers a vehicle to address the looming 12/31/15 deadline for Positive Train Control implementation.  The Act would extend the implementation deadline three additional years, or until 12/13/2018, with the potential for a one-time, discretionary extension of an additional 12 months if the Secretary of Transportation determines the criteria for such an extension in the Act are met.
 
This bill would extend the current congressionally-mandated deadline for PTC implementation, a development virtually all stakeholders recognized was necessary to prevent severe fines for noncompliant railroads by the FRA.  An extension also addresses the threatened cessation of rail service by carriers of Toxic/Poisonous by Inhalation (TIH/PIH) materials, and passenger traffic over non-compliant freight rail networks whose tracks are used by Amtrak and commuter railroads.
 
In a related development, TIH/PIH shipper associations the American Chemistry Council, the Chlorine Institute, and the Fertilizer Institute, have filed both a lawsuit against the Class I railroads in U.S. District Court in Washington, as well as Petition for Declaratory Order before the Surface Transportation Board.  Both the suit and the STB Petition seek rulings that railroads cannot embargo, or fail to transport, chemical shipments after 12/31/15 if PTC is not yet implemented, but rather, the statutory Common Carrier Obligation of 49 USC 11101 requires the railroads to transport the cars. 
 
The statutory extension of H.R. 3651 would eliminate both the enforcement deadline, as well as the threat of embargoed chemical & passenger traffic.
 
At present the stakes are still high as the PTC deadline is not yet resolved, however, with the introduction of H.R. 3651, at least path to an extension finally exists.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

GAO Agrees Railroads Won't Meet 2015 Positive Train Control Deadline

The Government Accountability Office (GOA) released a report yesterday on the status of the implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) systems on major freight and commuter railroads. The Report, attached here, was prepared at the request of Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and was originally provided to him on August 16, 2013.

The GAO's findings, and recommendations, mirror what the FRA determined one year ago in the FRA's own report to congress on PTC implementation. According to the most recent GAO report, only one major railroad, BNSF, will meet the current statutory deadline of 2015 for PTC. The GAO even doubts industry estimates by the AAR that compliance could be accomplished by the end of 2018.

GAO recommends that Congress amend the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA) to permit the FRA to:

(1) extend PTC deadlines on individual rail lines, and grant incremental extensions on a case-by-case basis;

(2) grant provisional certification of PTC systems under controlled conditions before final system certification (to address the concern of delays in certification following compliance deadlines caused by FRA resource limitations);

(3) approve the use of alternative safety technologies in lieu of PTC if PTC functions can be met by other means.